CLN - Industry Insights
Sponsored by
Clinical laboratory professionals have long operated as the diagnostic backbone of American healthcare, unseen, yet indispensable. Today, that backbone is under strain. Staffing shortages that began decades ago have compounded into a persistent national challenge, and laboratory leaders across the country are grappling with a question that has no simple answer: How do we keep our labs running at the level patients depend on?
Understanding the full scope of the problem is the first step toward addressing it effectively.
This is not a new problem. What has changed is the intensity. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated retirements, deepened burnout, and exposed how thin the talent pipeline had become. According to the American Society for Clinical Pathology's (ASCP’s) 2024 Vacancy Survey, published in the American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vacancy rates have declined compared with 2020–2022 but remain elevated relative to pre-pandemic levels. Retirement rates continue to rise, with 10 of the 17 laboratory departments surveyed reporting increases (1).
The survey gathered responses from 1,027 laboratory leaders and human resources professionals representing staffing data for more than 18,600 employees, making it one of the most comprehensive snapshots of the U.S. laboratory workforce available.
The shortage is not driven by a single cause. It is the product of several converging pressures that make recruitment and retention genuinely difficult.
The educational pipeline is simply not producing enough graduates. The American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science (ASCLS) has stated directly that the profession is educating less than half of the number of laboratory professionals needed (2). Accredited training programs face persistent constraints: limited faculty, insufficient clinical placement sites, and program closures driven by the high cost of operating laboratory science curricula.
At the same time, the workforce is aging. The ASCP 2024 Vacancy Survey found that retirement rates are accelerating across most laboratory departments (1). As experienced professionals exit, laboratories lose not just headcount but institutional knowledge, a loss that is difficult to quantify and harder to replace quickly.
Career visibility compounds the problem. Laboratory science does not attract the same awareness as nursing or physician pathways, and many prospective students remain unaware of the profession until late in their academic careers.
For laboratory directors and managers, the staffing shortage is not an abstraction; it shows up every shift. Fewer technologists covering more instruments, more specimens, and more documentation. Quality control steps that get deferred under time pressure. Turnaround times that inch upward.
These pressures carry real consequences beyond the lab walls. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has cited that roughly 70% of medical decisions depend on laboratory test results (3), reinforced by both the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (4), and the American Clinical Laboratory Association (5). When laboratory operations are compromised by staffing shortfalls, the effects on patient care are measurable and system-wide.
There is also a feedback loop at work. As staff exit, the workload increases for those who remain. That intensified pressure accelerates further burnout and turnover, and makes recruitment harder, as word spreads within a tight-knit professional community about demanding working conditions.
Experienced laboratory managers are not waiting for systemic solutions to arrive. Many are taking practical steps to build workforce resilience within their own organizations:
What separates labs that manage workforce challenges effectively from those that don't is rarely a single initiative. It is usually a combination of proactive planning, strong institutional relationships, and a willingness to think differently about how laboratory talent is sourced, developed, and retained.
Workforce stability is not simply a human resources matter. It is a patient safety matter, a quality matter, and increasingly, a financial matter. The labs best positioned for the next decade are those applying the same rigor to workforce strategy that they bring to their quality programs, with regular workforce planning, honest assessment of retention risk, and trusted partnerships to fill gaps when they arise.
The diagnostic mission of the laboratory has not changed. What is changing is the environment in which that mission must be executed and the strategies laboratory leaders need to carry it forward.
If you're rethinking your lab's workforce strategy, our team works directly with laboratory leaders to assess staffing gaps, identify risk, and build practical solutions tailored to your operation. Schedule a complimentary strategic workforce call with our team.
Industry Insights articles are created and paid for by advertisers. The views expressed in these articles do not necessarily represent ADLM's views, and their inclusion in CLN is not an endorsement by CLN or ADLM.