The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in an update to its algorithm for testing healthcare workers potentially exposed to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is now recommending an antibodies test 4 to 6 months following exposure. This is based on the agency’s current understanding of early HCV infection viral dynamics. CDC is also calling for preferential HCV RNA tests in source patients to respond to the increasing incidence of acute HCV infection among injectable drug users.
The new report reflects updated guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Infectious Diseases Society of America that recommends treatment of acute HCV infection.
Workers treating patients can get exposed through blood, bodily fluids, or sharps injuries. “Although sharps injury prevention measures have led to overall exposure decreases in recent decades, blood and body fluid exposures, including sharps injuries, continue to occur,” wrote the authors of the guidance, who published their recommendations in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
CDC developed this guidance in conjunction with occupational health and viral hepatitis epidemiology experts.
Guideline authors recommend two pathways for testing source patients: a nucleic acid test or NAT, or an antibody test (anti-HCV), following up with an HCV RNA if positive. NAT is the preferred route, especially when the source patient has engaged in high-risk behaviors such as injecting drugs.
The guideline recommends the following protocol for testing workers:
Patients or workers with positive HCV RNA results should be referred to further care and evaluation for treatment. Workers who remain anti-HCV negative after 4–6 months don’t require further follow-up, although an additional test for HCV RNA might be considered for individuals with immunocompromised systems or liver disease.
The guideline authors also recommended against HCV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. Their rationale: HCV transmission risk from percutaneous and mucocutaneous exposures is very low. In most cases, it makes no sense to give DAA to exposed healthcare workers due to potential side effects. “Furthermore, efficient duration of PEP has not been established,” the authors added.